Skin Silk Serum Foundation F13.7NW dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.9 (223)·Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: tan deep with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm/yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with cool rose undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation F13.7NW (Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Nudestix Tinted Cover Foundation in NUDE 8, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F13.7NW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF13.7NWClosest matchNUDE 8How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#ac6f4e#ab6f4cLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $40 more
