Skin Silk Serum Foundation F14.9NC dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.9 (223)·Deep tan · Olive · cool olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: dark cool skin with red undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep neutral skin with subtle red undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (40%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
29
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation F14.9NC (Deep tan · Olive · cool olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
SIIA Cosmetics Luminous Longwear Liquid Foundation in Americano, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F14.9NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF14.9NCClosest shade matchAmericanoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%98#916643#926641Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%78RadiantLuminousCloseLuminous finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80LightBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 016, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F14.9NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF14.9NCClosest overall alternative016How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#916643#8a6340Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep tanDeepCloseDepth difference: 2.4
Retailer descriptionDeep tanDeep tanBoth described as deep tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 85/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $3.49 more
Sephora
