SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear Bellini dupes and alternatives Saie
4.6 (205)·Rose · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling pink with multi-colored pearl
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (38%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (75%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than rose· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
49
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Peach Madeline, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Bellini. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBelliniClosest shade matchPeach MadelineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d2897a#d18c7dLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 70/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 20S rose, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Bellini. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBelliniClosest overall alternative20S roseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#d2897a#d49380Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
