SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear Tartufo dupes and alternatives Saie
4.6 (205)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim hydration· Same skin types: normal, dry, sensitive
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (29%)4.2 (339)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Chandni Raat, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Tartufo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTartufoClosest shade matchChandni RaatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#b68b82#ae8b85Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Studio, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Tartufo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTartufoClosest overall alternativeStudioHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#b68b82#b58577Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (63%)
