SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear Granita dupes and alternatives Saie
4.6 (205)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (50%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than golden· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than golden · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)· 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Silver rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Silver rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool neutral with silver pearl
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (71%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with gold pinpoints
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Jubilee, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Granita. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGranitaClosest shade matchJubileeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#cf947d#c8977fVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall37
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%33Normal, Dry, SensitiveSensitiveDifferentBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Hustle, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Granita. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGranitaClosest overall alternativeHustleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#cf947d#ce9586Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $2 more
