SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear Sorbetto dupes and alternatives Saie
4.6 (205)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peachy beige with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Karma Glitter, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Sorbetto. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSorbettoClosest shade matchKitten Karma GlitterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#cca594#d2a48fVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Sin, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Sorbetto. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSorbettoClosest overall alternativeSinHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#cca594#c9a49bClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared65
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$11.01 less (46%)
