SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear Biscotti dupes and alternatives Saie
4.6 (205)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (63%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
49
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (63%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Copper rather than nude· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Copper rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Copper rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Copper rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than nude· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 100 On Brand, against Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Biscotti. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBiscottiClosest match100 On BrandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#ae7563#b57461Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall83
Longevity50%9016-hour wear14-hour wearClose14-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall37
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%33Normal, Dry, SensitiveSensitiveDifferentBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 93/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
