Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: L1.2 - Very light to light with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L3.25 - light with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-one fair with a neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair complexion with warm yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: neutral fair with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 1C (Very fair · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Overall match 81/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Very Light 2, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 1C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1CClosest overall alternativeVery Light 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#fddfbd#fedfc4Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $8 more
CVS
