Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
56
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims colour stability
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 7N (Tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Coverage30%80BuildableLightCloseLight coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Dual Filter 2-In-1 Longwearing Concealer + Foundation in Tan Dark 26 Neutral, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 7N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7NClosest overall alternativeTan Dark 26 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#ad7850#ac7757Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionDeepDeep tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 89/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$24.01 less (62%)
Sephora
