Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick Mark Of A Kiss dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.4 (3,132)·Red · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: vivid bluish red with a matte finish
NARS Explicit Lipstick in Desirous – 867, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Mark Of A Kiss. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMark Of A KissClosest shade matchDesirous – 867How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%90#9f2425#992820Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall72
Finish55%78MatteSatinCloseSatin finish rather than matte
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in VIVA GLAM x Chappell Roan: Unnatural Redhead, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Mark Of A Kiss. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMark Of A KissClosest overall alternativeVIVA GLAM x Chappell Roan: Unnatural RedheadHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%91#9f2425#a82929Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall84
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared90
Longevity60%9010-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.