Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick So 90's dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.4 (3,132)·Brown · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (32%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$24.01 less (65%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Cinnamon Dreamz, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in So 90's. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSo 90'sClosest shade matchCinnamon DreamzHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%87#83260e#782a15Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Longevity60%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Petal Soft Lipstick Crayon in 303 Jeanne, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in So 90's. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSo 90'sClosest overall alternative303 JeanneHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%89#83260e#8a2f19Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 86/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.