Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick Pizzaz dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.4 (3,132)·Red · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Glossy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Glossy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Maybelline Super Stay Vinyl Ink Liquid Lipcolor in Lippy, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Pizzaz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePizzazClosest shade matchLippyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall98
Colour60%97#921521#970f21Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7010-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tom Ford Runway Lipstick Color with Hydrating, 12H Longwear in Cherry Lush, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Pizzaz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePizzazClosest overall alternativeCherry LushHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall97
Colour60%96#921521#951c23Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall72
Finish55%78MatteSatinCloseSatin finish rather than matte
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared90
Longevity60%9010-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 91/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.