Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick Walk of No Shame dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.4 (3,132)·Rose · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Red rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: vivid bluish red with a matte finish
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Red rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 24-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
33
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Locked Kiss Ink Lipstick in Gossip, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Walk of No Shame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalk of No ShameClosest shade matchGossipHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour60%90#9d1717#a3021aVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Cloud Crush Whipped Lip & Cheek Color in Red Velvet, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Walk of No Shame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalk of No ShameClosest overall alternativeRed VelvetHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall73
Colour60%84#9d1717#a40607Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 82/100Shade match 73/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.