#FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer Butterscotch 7.5 Golden dupes and alternatives Huda Beauty
4.5 (7,068)·Deep tan · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very tan to deep skin with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep tan with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Luminous rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Luminous rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for dark warm skin with golden undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
The closest shade to Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer Butterscotch 7.5 Golden (Deep tan · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Kosas Revealer Super Creamy + Brightening Concealer in Tone 8.2 W, against Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Butterscotch 7.5 Golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeButterscotch 7.5 GoldenClosest shade matchTone 8.2 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#a75e35#ae623cVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 74/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 14.5 Deep, against Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Butterscotch 7.5 Golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeButterscotch 7.5 GoldenClosest overall alternative14.5 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%94#a75e35#a7633cVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared87
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
