A Really Good Foundation 112M dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Medium · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same full coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
37
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 112M (Medium · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Milani Conceal + Perfect 2-in-1 Foundation in Tan, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 112M. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade112MClosest shade matchTanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#cb966a#c89368Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.6
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared88
Finish35%78Natural matteMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, normal, combination, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MERIT The Minimalist Perfecting Complexion Foundation and Concealer Stick in Bisque, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 112M. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade112MClosest overall alternativeBisqueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#cb966a#cd9a71Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 90/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
