A Really Good Foundation 113M dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Medium tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 36% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
46
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (52%)3.9 (4,653)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with a neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
37
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light-deep shade, golden undertone
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (45%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
25
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 113M (Medium tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW22, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 113M. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade113MClosest shade matchNW22How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#c68b5f#c78e64Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Light 100 W, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 113M. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade113MClosest overall alternativeLight 100 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#c68b5f#ca9063Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (55%)
