A Really Good Foundation 139D dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Rich deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep complexion with cool red undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for dry skin
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep shade with cool undertones 9
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for extra deep neutral skin with a peach hue
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Same full coverage· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with bronze neutral undertones
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 139D (Rich deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics CC+ Cream Natural Matte Foundation in Deep Cool, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 139D. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade139DClosest shade matchDeep CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#4d2712#482310Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared79
Finish35%78Natural matteMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, normal, combination, oilyCombination, oilyBoth marketed for combination/oily skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Soft Matte Longwear Foundation in 495, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 139D. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade139DClosest overall alternative495How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#4d2712#552a19Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $19 more
Walgreens
