A Really Good Foundation 120M dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (55%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium shade with warm undertones
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (31%)4.5 (18)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: warm mid-brown with soft depth
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 120M (Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
LORAC PRO Soft Focus Longwear Foundation in 17, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 120M. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade120MClosest match17How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%92#b18153#b98555Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 2.8
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $13 more
Sephora
