Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (33%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
71
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Purple rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: medium pink beige w/ silver micro glitter
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Plum rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Plum rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BRANDY FLAME, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 02 Desert Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade02 Desert SandClosest matchBRANDY FLAMEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%96#a7756c#a47368Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0DryNormal, CombinationDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 80/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
