Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (33%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Red rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Red rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 06 Canyon Clay. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade06 Canyon ClayClosest shade matchFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%85#b45a52#af5c4cClose colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Copp'D That, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 06 Canyon Clay. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade06 Canyon ClayClosest overall alternativeCopp'D ThatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%71#b45a52#b85641Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $2 more
Walmart
