Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep brown with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Oily rather than dry (skin types)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
77
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: deep brown with multi colored shimmer
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Bobbi Brown Crystal Eyes Shimmer Eyeshadow Stick in Bronze, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 11 Rich Espresso. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 Rich EspressoClosest shade matchBronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#794a40#7e4e45Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall20
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall60
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall53
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 67/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Cinnamon Spice, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 11 Rich Espresso. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 Rich EspressoClosest overall alternativeCinnamon SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#794a40#7f4d3fVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.