Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.8 (590)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than nude · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than nude· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than nude · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: bronzed plum with a hint of violet
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.50 less (65%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.8 (590)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than nude · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Walk Of No Shame, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 05 Sand Storm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade05 Sand StormClosest matchWalk Of No ShameHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%72#d55843#c06250Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared66
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 67/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$14 less (47%)
Sephora
