Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner 03 Hot Lava dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.5 (991)·Mauve · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (80%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling pink with multi-colored pearl
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
71
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (53%)4.4 (1,922)
Metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
bareMinerals GEN NUDE Liquid Mineral Eyeshadow in Mauve Amethyst, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 03 Hot Lava. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade03 Hot LavaClosest shade matchMauve AmethystHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#d7897e#c6877cClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall62
Longevity50%6016-hour wear8-hour wearSome difference8-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Rose Gold, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 03 Hot Lava. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade03 Hot LavaClosest overall alternativeRose GoldHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%94#d7897e#d98982Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $9 more
