Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
72
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Golden rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 04 Sienna. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade04 SiennaClosest shade matchFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#d48962#ca8360Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Terra, against Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 04 Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade04 SiennaClosest overall alternativeTerraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#d48962#d08f63Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared82
Longevity50%7516-hour wear11-hour wearSome difference11-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0DryOilyDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 85/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$8 less (27%)
