Teint Idole Ultra Wear Care and Glow Foundation 245C dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.5 (10,601)·Light · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light-Medium skin with a neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral to rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Light-medium with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light-Medium skin with a pinky-beige undertone
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 24-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Care and Glow Foundation 245C (Light · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 4, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Care and Glow Foundation in 245C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade245CClosest match4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#f3b385#f0b083Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.5
Retailer descriptionLightLight mediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%80MediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, combination, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.