Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush Cherry Custard dupes and alternatives Laura Geller
4.3 (1,171)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm coral with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shimmering deep coral with gold pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 50S Starlit Peach, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Cherry Custard. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCherry CustardClosest shade match50S Starlit PeachHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%99#eb807c#ed807cLooks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared51
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in French Rose, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Cherry Custard. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCherry CustardClosest overall alternativeFrench RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%97#eb807c#ef7d7aLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 99/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.