Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush Ethereal Rose dupes and alternatives Laura Geller
4.3 (1,171)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A nude pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: soft cool pink with subtle shimmer
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Maybelline Fit Me Blush in 20 Mauve, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Ethereal Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEthereal RoseClosest shade match20 MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%89#e3b0ac#edb0adVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 75/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals GEN NUDE BLONZER Blush + Bronzer in Kiss of Pink, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Ethereal Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEthereal RoseClosest overall alternativeKiss of PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour55%77#e3b0ac#f0aeb0Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%15CoolWarmDifferentCool against warm
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 85/100Shade match 74/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $10 more
