Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush Tropic Hues dupes and alternatives Laura Geller
4.3 (1,171)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 44% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Coral rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Coral rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Kaja Jelly Charm Glazed Lip Stain & Blush with Keychain in 05 Peach Fizz, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Tropic Hues. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTropic HuesClosest shade match05 Peach FizzHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%86#bb646b#b26263Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%20PowderGelDifferentGel rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Blush is Life Baked Talc-Free Dimensional + Brightening Blush in Dreamland, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Tropic Hues. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTropic HuesClosest overall alternativeDreamlandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour55%90#bb646b#bd6063Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 88/100Shade match 79/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$3 less (9%)
