Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush Sunlit Rose dupes and alternatives Laura Geller
4.3 (1,171)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Coral rather than pink· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Coral rather than pink · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
37
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Hope, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Sunlit Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunlit RoseClosest shade matchHopeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%97#e7848e#e88891Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 03 Radiant Pink, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Sunlit Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunlit RoseClosest overall alternative03 Radiant PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour55%76#e7848e#f8878aClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 87/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.