Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush Sunswept dupes and alternatives Laura Geller
4.3 (1,171)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Balm rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Balm rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than pink· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than pink · Balm rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: nude pink / light to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Blush in Hint, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Sunswept. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunsweptClosest shade matchHintHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%75#be816f#c7847bClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 82/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Baked Blush in Rose D'oro, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Sunswept. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunsweptClosest overall alternativeRose D'oroHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour55%73#be816f#cf7b69Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 83/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$3 less (9%)
Sephora
