Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush Pink Buttercream dupes and alternatives Laura Geller
4.3 (1,171)·Pink · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than pink· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than pink · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
51
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: mini matte peachy pink (no shimmer)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm coral with golden shimmer
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Westman Atelier Baby Cheeks Lip + Cheek Cream Blush Stick in Petal, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Pink Buttercream. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink ButtercreamClosest shade matchPetalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%94#e4898a#e08a8eVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 73/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 03 Radiant Pink, against Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Pink Buttercream. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink ButtercreamClosest overall alternative03 Radiant PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%81#e4898a#f8878aClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 92/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $6 more
