Colour Riche Intense Volume Matte Lipstick 635 dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.5 (10,199)·Pink · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than pink· 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than pink· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than pink · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in You Wouldn't Get It, against L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Intense Volume Matte Lipstick in 635. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade635Closest matchYou Wouldn't Get ItHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%92#aa4954#a85158Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall64
Longevity60%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6.01 more
