Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush Baby Girl dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim waterproof· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than pink· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than pink · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim waterproof· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Stain rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stain rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Dandelion, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Baby Girl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBaby GirlClosest shade matchDandelionHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#efa8a2#f0a49cLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Overall match 87/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Benefit Cosmetics Dandelion Baby-Pink Brightening Blush in Full Size, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Baby Girl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBaby GirlClosest overall alternativeFull SizeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%91#efa8a2#f3b1abVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Longevity50%8012-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$21.01 less (62%)
