Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush Cheeky Chili dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Red · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Looks identical · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
→Strawberry Latte - Strawberry Fizz, Rose Chai, Latte, Pink Espresso
73
overall
Shade match76
$45SephoraCosts $11 more4.6 (1,018)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Berry rather than red· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than red · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a delicious blend of creamy mauve, warm rose, and rich espresso tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than red
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than red· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than red · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Terra, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Cheeky Chili. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCheeky ChiliClosest shade matchTerraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%89#b65348#ab5145Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Overall match 85/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 111A - Undressed Velvet, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Cheeky Chili. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCheeky ChiliClosest overall alternative111A - Undressed VelvetHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%82#b65348#b04a46Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $3 more
