Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush Loudspeaker dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
57
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: bright orange with gold pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Red rather than coral· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than coral· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than coral · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Apricot rather than coral· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Apricot rather than coral · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Too Faced Cloud Crush Whipped Lip & Cheek Color in Peach Blur, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Loudspeaker. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLoudspeakerClosest shade matchPeach BlurHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%90#f8543e#f05d4aVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Finish50%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Obsession - 923, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Loudspeaker. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLoudspeakerClosest overall alternativeObsession - 923How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour55%68#f8543e#e76658Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Overall match 85/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.