Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush Blushbaby dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Pink · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Balm rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Balm rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
57
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
ILIA Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint in Tenderly, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Blushbaby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushbabyClosest shade matchTenderlyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%85#fa9298#ea9299Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Orgasm Edge – 778, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Blushbaby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushbabyClosest overall alternativeOrgasm Edge – 778How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%87#fa9298#f6878cVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $15 more
