Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush LaLaLavender dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
72
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Blush in 51 Trust Yourself, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in LaLaLavender. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLaLaLavenderClosest shade match51 Trust YourselfHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour55%56#c190aa#df8bb3Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall54
Finish50%25MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 63/100Shade match 75/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Cheek Pop Powder Blush in Pansy Pop, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in LaLaLavender. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLaLaLavenderClosest overall alternativePansy PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour55%64#c190aa#d19ec4Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%76LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 8.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 72/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
