Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush Gingerly dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Brown / nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
72
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
72
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Retailer shade note: warm coppery rose for medium-deep skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: bronze rose with golden pearl
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than brown / nude · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than brown / nude · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 280 Shimmer Mocha Havana, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Gingerly. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGingerlyClosest shade match280 Shimmer Mocha HavanaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%86#d6846b#cf8b74Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall34
Finish50%25MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 72/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Blush in Mocha, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Gingerly. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGingerlyClosest overall alternativeMochaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%83#d6846b#d58f78Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Overall match 88/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
