Color Sensational Shaping Lip Liner Rich Wine dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.3 (37,257)·Berry · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format and precision: retractable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than berry· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
66
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than berry · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than berry· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than berry · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than berry · Does not claim smudge and transfer
MAC Cosmetics Lip Liner Pencil in Root For Me!, against Maybelline Color Sensational Shaping Lip Liner in Rich Wine. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich WineClosest shade matchRoot For Me!How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall86
Colour60%84#4a2a37#4b2c32Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Format and precision20%85RetractablePencilClosePencil rather than retractable
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 72/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Palladio Beauty Retractable Waterproof Lip Liner in Black Berry, against Maybelline Color Sensational Shaping Lip Liner in Rich Wine. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich WineClosest overall alternativeBlack BerryHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall85
Colour60%76#4a2a37#462129Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth20%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family10%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a finish
Wear & performance25% of overall70
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Format and precision20%100RetractableRetractableSameBoth retractable
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 75/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.