Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow Glitch dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic mid-tone pink with gold flecks
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: warm nudie pink with rainbow sparkle
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.50 less (52%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: liquid· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: bronzed plum with a hint of violet
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (18%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Nudestix NUDIES MATTE All Over Face Blush Color in Sweet Cheeks, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Glitch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlitchClosest shade matchSweet CheeksHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#b45a55#bf5b5dClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared8
Finish65%0DuochromeMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall82
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 62/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Dreamy Beams, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Glitch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlitchClosest overall alternativeDreamy BeamsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%64#b45a55#a26661Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Finish65%94DuochromeGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 79/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.