Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow Nebulous dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer white with prismatic pearls
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (73%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (73%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Juvia's Place CULTURE Duochrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Fula, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Nebulous. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNebulousClosest shade matchFulaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%94#c8c8ce#c7c9d2Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Silver Surfer, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Nebulous. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNebulousClosest overall alternativeSilver SurferHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#c8c8ce#c9c9caVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormalNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 93/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.