Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow Siren dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Pink · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 40% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (18%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Purple rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.01 less (46%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic rustic reddish brown
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (18%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Sitara Sparkles, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Siren. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSirenClosest matchSitara SparklesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%68#8a4853#875556Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 79/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $17 more
Ulta Beauty
