Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow Lab coat dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: White rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Blue rather than pink· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Blue rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sheer opal with silver, pink, violet and blue sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Blue rather than pink· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Blue rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling transparent icy blue with duo-chrome reflects
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: White rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: opalescent white w/pink, violet & blue duochrome effects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: White rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: White rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Silver rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (73%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer white with prismatic pearls
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (73%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· White rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · White rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: White rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than pink· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Maybelline Shadow Drip Eye Tint Liquid Eye Shadow in Amethyst Drip, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Lab coat. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLab coatClosest matchAmethyst DripHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%89#f1e5e4#ecdfe2Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $6 more
