Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow Muse dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Bronze · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than bronze· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than bronze · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than bronze· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than bronze · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$8.01 less (36%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same warm undertone
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
13
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 201 Milky Way, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Muse. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMuseClosest shade match201 Milky WayHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%95#a8745d#a3735fLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 78/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Beaming Brighter, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Muse. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMuseClosest overall alternativeBeaming BrighterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%81#a8745d#a46a53Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormalNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12 more
