Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow Horoscope dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Taupe rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Taupe rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: brushed gold with silver shimmer
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
8
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Twilight, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Horoscope. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoroscopeClosest matchTwilightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%87#a98e82#a68978Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.