Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 16B Fair-Light Beige dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (2,174)·Fair · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for combination/normal skin
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for fair skin with rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Extra light with neutral undertones
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (67%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: fair with cool pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Very Fair with cool pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Very Fair with Cool Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with pink undertones
The closest shade to Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 16B Fair-Light Beige (Fair · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation in 20B Light Beige, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 16B Fair-Light Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16B Fair-Light BeigeClosest shade match20B Light BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#eecbb7#f0cbb6Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionFairLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 81/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW7, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 16B Fair-Light Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16B Fair-Light BeigeClosest overall alternativeNW7How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#eecbb7#ebccb8Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionFairNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 92/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Same price
