Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 36H Medium-Tan Honey dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (2,174)·Light medium · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 37% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: golden brown shade with warm undertones
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (48%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (64%)3.9 (223)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: For medium skin tones with a neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
$41Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (2%)4.3 (1,733)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with a neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (62%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium with Peachy Undertones
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (55%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
43
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 36H Medium-Tan Honey (Light medium · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in W5 Warm Medium, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 36H Medium-Tan Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade36H Medium-Tan HoneyClosest shade matchW5 Warm MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#e0aa82#dfa981Looks identicalColour difference 0.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NC14.5, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 36H Medium-Tan Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade36H Medium-Tan HoneyClosest overall alternativeNC14.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#e0aa82#dcaa83Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 92/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$2.50 less (6%)
