Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 58S Rich Sand dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (2,174)·Very deep · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep complexion with neutral undertones
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 45% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep complexion with warm golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deep skintones with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: extra deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deep skintones with warm bronze undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: D5 - deep with warm undertones
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (17%)4.5 (1,573)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep with warm olive undertones
The closest shade to Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 58S Rich Sand (Very deep · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Natural Matte Foundation in 535N, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 58S Rich Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade58S Rich SandClosest shade match535NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#6f4127#704127Looks identicalColour difference 0.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 57S Rich Sand, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 58S Rich Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade58S Rich SandClosest overall alternative57S Rich SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#6f4127#6c462fVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Same price
