Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 44H Tan Honey dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (2,174)·Medium · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral-golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: For tan skin tones with a red neutral undertone
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (67%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan with warm-olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm, peach undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (62%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: MD2.6 - medium-deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Tan skin with neutral-olive undertones
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (10%)4.4 (657)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (40%)5.0 (4)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous finish
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Golden Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to dark w/ gold/peach/brown undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
The closest shade to Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 44H Tan Honey (Medium · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation in 490 Golden Amber, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 44H Tan Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44H Tan HoneyClosest shade match490 Golden AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#d29568#d29769Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 82/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 610 Cebu, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 44H Tan Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44H Tan HoneyClosest overall alternative610 CebuHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%95#d29568#cf946cLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 87/100Shade match 89/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $7 more
