Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 48S Tan-Deep Sand dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (2,174)·Medium tan · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (43%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (43%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep with golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (62%)4.2 (324)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$39.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.50 less (6%)4.4 (15,124)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan/dark skin w/ golden undertones
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (10%)4.4 (657)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle warm undertones
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (55%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
43
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (55%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
43
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (62%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (69%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
The closest shade to Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 48S Tan-Deep Sand (Medium tan · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Matte Velvet Blurring Powder Foundation in 3Y46 Warm Cinnamon, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 48S Tan-Deep Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48S Tan-Deep SandClosest shade match3Y46 Warm CinnamonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#c88b5b#c78a58Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW22, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 48S Tan-Deep Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48S Tan-Deep SandClosest overall alternativeNW22How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c88b5b#c78e64Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Same price
CVS
